Democracy – They wouldn’t know it if it bit them

national | worker & community struggles and protests | opinion/analysis

Monday June 02, 2008 19:59

by Gregor Kerr - Member Workers Solidarity Movement & Irish National Teachers Organisation (personal capacity)

The trade union movement and the Lisbon Treaty vote

A number of weeks ago, a member of the INTO (Irish National Teachers Organisation) submitted a letter for publication in the union magazine ‘In Touch’. This was in response to a request in the previous issue of the magazine for members to write letters for publication. This is the story of what happened....

A number of weeks ago, a member of the INTO (Irish National Teachers Organisation) submitted a letter for publication in the union magazine ‘In Touch’. This was in response to a request in the previous issue of the magazine for members to write letters for publication.

The letter dealt with the topic of the Lisbon Treaty and outlined the author’s opinion that union members should Vote No in the referendum. However the author received a reply from the magazine editor (a full-time INTO official) saying that the letter would not be published because it was long-standing union policy not to take a stance on political matters.

A couple of weeks later, the Irish Congress of Trade Unions took a vote to decide its stance on Lisbon. To be consistent with the ‘long standing policy’ referred to above, one would expect that the INTO representatives at the Congress meeting would abstain. But amazingly that is not what happened. In fact the INTO representatives at the Congress meeting voted in favour of recommending a Yes vote to Lisbon. Even more amazingly, it has since emerged that the issue was not even discussed at CEC (Central Executive Committee) level within the union. It seems that the union leadership simply looked into their hearts and knew what the members would think!

Whatever one’s views on Lisbon, this affront to democracy and contempt for the views of ordinary members should shock and anger all trade unionists. I’d be interested to know how other unions – those for and against the Treaty came to their position. If this level of contempt for democracy is allowed to go unchallenged, it will have serious repercussions for all trade unionists.

save preference

Comments (5 of 5)

politics

by patrique - nipsa

Mon Jun 02, 2008 23:15

Unfortunately my union chose to stand with the Continuity IRA and the dissident loyalists and wish to remain outside the political arena. They think this gains them respect.

As for a union over riding the voice of a member, well that is standard procedure.

Likewise (Unfortunately)

by RogerC

Tue Jun 03, 2008 09:38

As a NIPSA member I am in the same boat as Patrique above. Thus confirming to me that though it was democraticaly arrived at. NIPSA did a major bit of "Foot shooting" at last weeks conference.

just a thought

Tue Jun 03, 2008 11:55

On Union officials not representing their members wishes. What about the "Crazy" idea of unions electing their representitives!!

CPSU

by Trade Unionist

Wed Jun 04, 2008 18:38

Is it true that Blair Horan, CPSU General Secretary who is one of the principal trade union advovates of a Yes vote took that Yes position without consultation with the Executive of the union?

Yes

by PDEV

Thu Jun 05, 2008 10:56

Yes that is true. He is campaigning for a yes vote despite this not being his union's position.

Upcoming Events

New Events

Other Press

User Preferences

Feeds

Blog Feeds

Anti-Empire

The Saker

Public Inquiry

Voltaire Network

Democracy – They wouldn’t know it if it bit them

Comments (5 of 5)