Interested in maladministration. Estd. 2005
RTEs Sarah McInerney ? Fianna Fail?supporter? Anthony
Joe Duffy is dishonest and untrustworthy Anthony
Robert Watt complaint: Time for decision by SIPO Anthony
RTE in breach of its own editorial principles Anthony
Waiting for SIPO Anthony Public Inquiry >>
Promoting Human Rights in IrelandHuman Rights in Ireland >>
Ethnic Minority Candidate Given Police Job Despite Failing Interview Thu May 01, 2025 19:00 | Will Jones Senior officers in?West Yorkshire Police ? the force recently in the news for blocking white job applicants ??intervened to ensure that an ethnic minority candidate who failed her interview was given the job.
The post Ethnic Minority Candidate Given Police Job Despite Failing Interview appeared first on The Daily Sceptic.
Migrant Channel Crossings Hit 10,000 in Record Time Under Labour Despite Starmer?s ?Smash the Gangs?... Thu May 01, 2025 17:05 | Will Jones The number of migrants?crossing the Channel so far this year?has hit 10,000 in record time under Labour, as the total runs 40% higher than last year despite Starmer's pledge to "smash the gangs".
The post Migrant Channel Crossings Hit 10,000 in Record Time Under Labour Despite Starmer’s “Smash the Gangs” Pledge appeared first on The Daily Sceptic.
Which Ideology is Most Receptive to Bullshit? Thu May 01, 2025 15:04 | Noah Carl Which ideology is most receptive to bullshit? A Swedish study found that social conservatives are more receptive than social liberals but that Greens were the most receptive of all.
The post Which Ideology is Most Receptive to Bullshit? appeared first on The Daily Sceptic.
COVID-19 Started in America, Not China, New Chinese Government Report Claims Thu May 01, 2025 13:04 | Will Jones COVID-19 started in America, not China, a new Chinese Government report has claimed, in the latest salvo in the five-year long propaganda war over the origins of the virus.
The post COVID-19 Started in America, Not China, New Chinese Government Report Claims appeared first on The Daily Sceptic.
Transgender Players Banned from Women?s Football in England Thu May 01, 2025 11:00 | Will Jones Transgender women are to be banned from playing women?s football in England following the Supreme Court ruling that trans women are legally men, as the FA follows its Scottish counterpart in bringing in a ban.
The post Transgender Players Banned from Women’s Football in England appeared first on The Daily Sceptic. Lockdown Skeptics >>
Voltaire, international edition
Will intergovernmental institutions withstand the end of the "American Empire"?,... Sat Apr 05, 2025 07:15 | en
Voltaire, International Newsletter N?127 Sat Apr 05, 2025 06:38 | en
Disintegration of Western democracy begins in France Sat Apr 05, 2025 06:00 | en
Voltaire, International Newsletter N?126 Fri Mar 28, 2025 11:39 | en
The International Conference on Combating Anti-Semitism by Amichai Chikli and Na... Fri Mar 28, 2025 11:31 | en Voltaire Network >>
|
‘Drone strikes killed more civilians than publicly acknowledged’ – UN investigator
international |
anti-war / imperialism |
other press
Saturday October 19, 2013 14:06 by Turing

Yes, the level of the slaughter is being covered up. Full story at link.
A UN report accuses the United States of downplaying the number of civilians killed in anti-terrorist drone operations, while failing to assist in the investigation by releasing its own figures.
With the increased use of remotely piloted aircraft in military operations in a number of countries, the nagging question of civilian “collateral damage” as a consequence of these deadly technologies is a growing concern for the United Nations and human right groups.
In Afghanistan, for example, the number of aerial drone strikes surged from 294 in 2011 to 447 during the first 11 months of 2012, according to data released by the US Air Force in November 2012, UN Special Rapporteur Ben Emmerson noted in his interim report.
Pakistan officials confirmed that out of 2,200 deaths “at least 400 civilians had been killed as a result of remotely piloted aircraft strikes and a further 200 individuals were regarded as probable non-combatants.”
 Pakistani protesters belonging to United Citizen Action march behind a burning US flag during a protest in Multan on September 30, 2013, against the US drone attacks in Pakistani tribal areas (AFP Photo / S.S Mirza) Emmerson’s 24-page document, which is due to be presented to the UN General Assembly next Friday, mentions a report by a US military advisor that contradicted official US claims that drone attacks were responsible for fewer civilian deaths compared with other aerial platforms, for example, fighter jets.
He pointed to research by Larry Lewis, a research scientist at the Center for Naval Analyses, who examined aerial strikes in Afghanistan from mid-2010 to mid-2011. With the help of classified military data, Lewis found that the missile strikes conducted by drones were “10 times more deadly to Afghan civilians” than those performed by fighter jets, according to a report by The Guardian newspaper.
|
View Comments Titles Only
save preference
Comments (7 of 7)
Jump To Comment: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7The figure of 2,200 drone deaths is probably an underestimate and remember that is only counting Afghanistan. These things are being used in quite a lot of countries although probably not to the same extent as Afghanistan.
These deaths do make a complete mockery of the notion of fighting terrorism since these attacks are quite simply acts of terror themselves carried out by the biggest rogue state about.
Six protesters who broke into RAF Waddington in Lincolnshire, home of Britain's first unmanned drones base, were described by a judge at their trial on Monday as "dutiful people". He said it was only with a "heavy heart" that he found them guilty of criminal damage to the base.
The six, who staged their protest on 3 June to mark International Child Victims of War Day, were detained only after civilian police were called to the base.
District Judge Stobart ruled: "I find, and not without some hesitation, that the lack of proximity or relationship between the defendants and those in Afghanistan who may be either targeted or hit accidentally by these drones is insufficient. I therefore, with a very heavy heart, find all the defendants guilty.
"http://www.theguardian.com/world/2013/oct/07/anti-drone...judge
I totally welcome this posting and also Gilmore should be asked serious questions in relation to American war planes going through Shannon. People - not their fault, see drones as silent humming birds in the sky, what they don't see is the killing machines that they really are.
I would like to end by asking the moderators tonight and I use the word please deeply to give the posting on asbestos, one last chance. I ask you Wageslave to do this please because I know numerous people who have been reading Indymedia, not just here, but in Camden town, Cricklewood and Kilburn. At the moment, I am on business in Germany and I was talking to former factory workers there and to my amazement they were reading Indymedia Ireland.
I have to agree the slagging matches in relation to the Attic must stop now. I say this to Mr Murphy and to Cara, please stop. I hope that the posting can go back up as I said for one last chance to redeem the purpose of its existence and the video 'Death on the Docks' which has the capacity to show people the dangers of what asbestos can cause in health disease to people exposed to it.
I had planned over the long weekend to put up a second video on asbestos and I hope this opportunity will be given to me but only if Mr Murphy can stop the rants and the personal attacks on individuals. This is not the agenda. We need to focus on a topic that the public ought to know about.
Wageslave, I again ask you, just one last chance, and I hope Mr Murphy can take on board that this is the last chance saloon for his topic because I will not assist on this posting if he continues with his behaviour. This is about Asbestos not personal grudges.
Back to the drones, I agree totally with Mary Kelly and the others. These drones are in existence a long time now and RTE sadly but not to my amazement don't highlight the destruction and slaughter of the innocents.
I thank you Wageslave if you can give Mr Murphy, who I don't know from Adam the opportunity to redeem himself in the plight of the topic asbestos.
Brian Flannery
brian
for the record, I am in favour of hugh's article being unhidden.
I have petitioned on the editorial list for the asbestos article to be reinstated but other moderators have disagreed and because of this currently I am powerless to reinstate the article. Perhaps in light of the recent interest shown in it, there will be a change of heart??
rgds
wageslave
At the moment I am away on business. I have been showing several Irish people that are now in various countries how to process Indymedia and make their opinions known from afar.
I will be looking forward to more debates on the site in the coming months. The point this morning I want to make is quite relevant. I have received enormous feedback from people in Ireland and abroad that the link for 'Death on the Docks' should be, if possible, reinstated. It has caught the mindset of many. I understand that there are guidelines. I understand that there are legal implications and I also understand from a Belfast source that Mr Murphy has calmed down. I believe that your colleagues should stand up on this one. Take out the aggressive comments and let this topic flow, if it is possible. I believe nothing is impossible if you really want it.
Ironically I know Maura Harrington and I am reading William's reply - she meant no offence because she is not that type of person, she only stated that she can't understand where he is coming from with all the various links that lead back to his personal blog. I wish William the very best in his quest for justice but I do believe simplicity in the way we write is the key for others to understand.
Seeing I am on the topic of Drones. Again, I say sadly of the thousands of people and children that these machines have slaughtered. The Americans class them as their toys but the world must be able to see the slaughter of the innocents.
Thanking you again in your reply and hopefully the other moderators who I also appreciate because they give their time voluntarily in running Indymedia on a daily basis.
Brian Flannery
There was an article carried on Information Clearing House on Fri which is basically the confessions of a Drone operator, Brandon Bryant and how eventually the job got to him and he quit because of it.
In it, he describes the day to day operations of a drone pilot and "sensor" operator -the one who presses the button to release the Hellfire missiles that travel at supersonic speed to their human targets to blow them apart. He describes how he was lured into the job through the Air Force at only age 21 and then some of the particular instances including his first kill as described here in this extract:
This is what the brave soldiers get up to. As we can see these guys had no-one idea and had zero chance. The procedure for checking whether they are armed was basically if it looked like a weapon, then it was a weapon. It was essentially plane murder.
The article goes on to describe other aspects of the drone operations and notes that: "by 2025, drones will be an $82 billion business.."
What we also discover is that Bryant came from a poor background and he struggled to afford to get education and go to college. As usual the regularly exploits these kind of people with the offers of jobs and education.
He not only operated drones from a base in Nevada but spent time in Iraq working from bases there where the drones were used in conjunction with soldiers on patrol and in this next extract describes the more mundane side too.
By the time 2011 he had enough as it had finally got to him. And while for some reading this we may take some comfort in the fact that his conscience got to him and he quit, from the Air Force point of view, they don't particularly care as they have 100s of more recruits ready to step in where he left off and after each of them goes through the same cycle and quits, yet more people will be killed. And to the Air Force that is all that matters, -having operators at the controls who will fire the missiles and kill on command.
This next extract shows this to some extent:
And what this figure shows is the just one operator managed 1,626 kills and very likely more unaccounted. There are 100s if not 1000s of operators and this shows what a lie it is when the US govt downplays the number of people killed by drones. The figures out there are probably underestimated by at least a factor of 10 if not 100.
Full article can be read at the link below
Article from Robert Frisk of the Independent:
http://www.independent.co.uk/voices/comment/civilians-a....html